Blogs RSS Feed


Density is Too High


Barnet Council has a development plan for new developments in the borough, which is currently called the ‘Unitary Development Plan’. This will soon be replaced by the ‘Local Development Framework’ (LDF). The LDF proposes where new building will take place and proposes increased density housing along main routes such as the A.1000.

As a London borough, Barnet is guided on acceptable density for new housing by the London Plan, which considers density based on ‘Public Transport Accessibility Levels (PTAL). The final decisions on what is allowed rests with the local planning authority, in our case, Barnet Council.

While we can accept that there will be some variation from the PTAL Density ratings given by the GLA, Barnet Council officers are proposing acceptance for planning applications for flatted developments more than two times higher than those set by the London Plan.

This is of particular concern to the Society and local residents surrounding the sites at North Finchley where two large proposals for high-density flatted development have been made. On this part of the A.1000 the old Furnitureland building and Police Depot at 931 High Road propose buildings up to six storeys. If allowed, this will cause a ‘canyon effect’ along the A.1000.

The London Plan suggests areas for intensified use, “Urban Dense development, with a mix of different uses and buildings of three to four storeys, such as town centres, along main arterial routes and substantial parts of inner London.” Compared to the three to four storey limit given here, Barnet’s officers are suggesting acceptance of proposals for five to six storeys. This is not wanted by residents and would damage the character of the area.

Officers claim that both sites are ‘urban’ due to their High Road frontage. The majority of both sites goes back in to suburban housing, particularly 931 High Road, so are in fact mainly ‘suburban’.

Councillors against officers’ advice refused previous applications for both Police Depot and Furnitureland at Committee. Traffic congestion is a regular event at North Finchley. Surely it does not make sense to allow ‘canyon effect’ along the A.1000 with even more traffic congestion that must inevitably follow?


Comments(7)

Jon10 says...
1:28pm Sat 12 Jun 10

Any and all development in Barnet in going to increase traffic congestion.

There are suggested plans for light-rail across the borough, but Barnet Council's Cabinet Member for Environment and Transport was reported in the Times as saying, "My priorities are roads, roads, roads and roads."

http://www.barnet.go
v.uk/press_releases.
htm?id=2212

Grumblepop says...
7:35pm Sat 12 Jun 10

I agree with the author that Barnet since 2002 have failed to consult on developing a sustainable community regarding high density and infrastructure.
We have seriously consider the threat to our communities Housing Health and Built Environment under Barnet's Future Shape proposals similar to the EasyRyanjet model.

If any of you campaigners feel that there has been a failure to consult on urban development for a sustainable community then I recommend Leigh Day & Co whom may be of assistance. They have, in the past been of helpful assistance to colleagues and friends from Barnet on similar regeneration and redevelopment consultation issues.
Leigh Day & Co
http://www.leighday.
co.uk/

Mr Reasonable says...
7:28am Mon 14 Jun 10

The LDF is a flawed document. It was due to be tabled at the forthcoming cabinet committee but it has now been withdrawn. Given that Barnet is now the most populous London Borough and has the highest level of traffic congestion of any London Borough, it must be time to rethink this ill conceived and unpopluar document.

Grumblepop says...
12:18pm Mon 14 Jun 10

I would agree on the " Re-think" but sadly that is not possible because we all had a chance to "re-think" the complete Barnet Community and Plc process, instead, we rejected it.

Grumblepop says...
1:37pm Mon 14 Jun 10

This is what Conservative Columnists in the Daily Express think of Barnet's Conservative Council: http://www.express.c
o.uk/posts/view/1808
17/Cut-these-greedy-
pen-pushers-and-free
-the-nation


"Too much public sector recruitment is nothing more than an employment racket for over-paid bureaucrats. Only this month, for instance, Barnet Council in North London has advertised for three assistant directors on salaries totalling over £300,000, "

Rog T says...
7:17pm Mon 14 Jun 10

Grumblepop,

Glad you enjoyed the link from the Barnet Eye !

Grumblepop says...
9:51pm Mon 14 Jun 10

Rog,

Have to spread the word to those who might not catch your blog, yes, sorry I did forget to put a link to the Barnet Eye. Interesting article, Mr Reasonable did "say his piece" at the McKinstry article. The Credit is still all yours. It is a huge event a Tory newspaper popping one at, one of it's own.


Our Bloggers

RSS