Latest council outsourcing plans 'risk public health', says Barnet Alliance for Public Services

Campaign group the Barnet Alliance for Public Services (BAPS) has vehemently opposed the One Barnet outsourcing scheme from the outset Campaign group the Barnet Alliance for Public Services (BAPS) has vehemently opposed the One Barnet outsourcing scheme from the outset

Campaigners have warned council plans to outsource departments including environmental health will put public safety at risk.

Barnet Council is looking to move its regulatory services - which also include trading standards - to the private sector to save cash.

The deal would be the latest in a series of privatisation plans under the authority’s One Barnet scheme.

Campaign group the Barnet Alliance for Public Services (BAPS) has fought the scheme from the outset and is gathering a new petition opposing the latest move.

The council says it will save in the region of £26million over the contract period, depending on the successful bidder, but BAPS co-ordinator Tirza Waisel believes the strategy is “extremely risky”.

She said: “They are exposing our very health to risk. It is a big issue if environmental health officers are employed for profit. We believe that if they have targets in certain areas, they could be more concerned about that than public health.

“The same goes for things like building safety – people should be extremely worried about this.”

The council was due to announce its two final bidders for the regulatory services contract in January.

But negotiations have been put on hold pending the outcome of a judicial review into the outsourcing of the council’s customer services contracts – in which regulatory services is also mentioned.

The council’s deputy leader Daniel Thomas said: “Our plan is for a joint venture with a private sector company that will add commercial nous to our in-house team to generate both savings and income for the taxpayer.

“In practice this will mean that we will probably be the only council actually investing in, and growing, services such as environmental health, while other councils cut theirs. 

“BAPS seems to have a policy of opposing any use of private companies in delivering any public services. I honestly don't care whether we use private, public or, as in this case, a joint venture. I just want the best possible value for our residents.”

BAPS gathered a petition of more than 8,000 signatures when it opposed the recent outsourcing of the customer services departments.

The petition forced a council vote on whether to abandon the plans, which was rejected by the Conservative majority.

Ms Waisel said: “They didn’t listen to 8,000 residents last time and unless they have learned their lesson, which they will at the next election, I imagine it will be the same.

“But the alternative is to just lie down and take it and we won’t do that – we’re willing to keep fighting.”

Comments(3)

nlygo says...
5:54pm Mon 4 Mar 13

this is the most pathetic scaremongering yet!

these people would be the first to complain if the council weren't looking to save money. the alternative would be an increase in the Council Tax

last week, whilst other councils announced increases in the Council Tax, Barnet announced that it will be frozen for both 2013/14 and 2014/15

I am sure that once outsourcing is finally agreed, the majority of services carried out by the private sector will be perfectly successful

of course, I am also not so blinkered to assume that everything will work well. but opportunities must be taken to save money

Mr Reasonable says...
11:26am Tue 5 Mar 13

NLYGO is obviously unaware of the concerns that some outsourcing companies have about taking over some of these critical services. Whilst certain low risk routine inspection work can be contracted out they steer clear of high risk activity. Indeed, one outsourcing company said, "We encourage our clients not to outsource their high-risk work because we feel the purpose of outsourcing is so that we can take category B and below, freeing the authority to focus on its high-risk premises". Barnet is outsourcing the lot and that just seems reckless to me. See the full article published by The Chartered Institute of Environmental Health http://www.cieh.org/
ehn/ehn3.aspx?id=337
02
This hasn't been thought through as to the ways in which outsourcing might complement the existing service, simply a political ideology of eliminating the public sector and that is why people are concerned.

rony says...
12:02am Thu 7 Mar 13

and the petition can be found on the council petition website and here: http://www.avaaz.org
/en/petition/Stop_th
e_privatisation_of_R
egulatory_Services/?
fYxCBbb&pv=2

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree