Costly Capita arrangement prevents Barnet Council IT 'catastrophe' after 2E2 goes into administration

Barnet Council is forking out tens of thousands of pounds for “emergency” IT services after its regular provider went into administration.

The authority has been forced into a costly interim arrangement with business processes firm Capita after IT company 2E2 Ltd called in administrators.

Finance officers are now looking at how the authority can reclaim £220,000 in advance payments to 2E2, which passed a council credit check days before it collapsed.

The council is now paying £72,000 a month to Capita compared to the £69,000-a-month contract it had agreed with 2E2, which provided technology services for the council’s security, data storage and communications.

Barnet Labour says the news should act as “a warning shot” to the council over its One Barnet outsourcing scheme, under which it is looking to hand over £700million of contracts to the private sector.

Labour group leader Alison Moore said: “It seems crazy. It shows that putting all your eggs in one basket can be disastrous if the agreement fails.

“The situation highlights the risks of outsourcing and shows that the authority is very vulnerable when it puts its fate in the hands of private companies.”

2E2 informed the council of its precarious financial state on January 29.

Nine days later, the business cancelled its £836,000-a-year contract and ceased provision of all IT services.

The information was released in council papers published on Thursday, in which officers predicted “catastrophic” repercussions if an alternative provider was not found.

Capita had already successfully bid to take on the council’s IT provision in June under the customer service contract tendered within the One Barnet scheme last year.

The decision is the subject of a judicial review, due to be heard at the High Court next week, but council officers quickly arranged an “emergency” contract to ensure IT provision overlapped.

Councillor Daniel Thomas, deputy leader and cabinet member for resources and performance, said: “I’m very pleased with the way officers handled this and we were able to move seamlessly to a new support contract.

“There are obviously costs attached to the contract but there would also be costs attached to an in-house service as well.”

Comments(5)

Mr Reasonable says...
4:42pm Mon 11 Mar 13

Cllr Thomas may be pleased with himself but what I want to know is why did Barnet renew this contract with 2e2 at the Cabinet Resources Committee, chaired by Cllr Thomas, just 15 weeks before the firm went bust. This has cost the Council, and by default residents, £220,000. Yes they had to find a new contractor quickly - so they picked Capita - but why were we put in that position in the first place. Too much focus on implementing One Barnet and not enough attention on the day to day running of the council.

Mr unreasonable and always looking for fault says...
5:51pm Mon 11 Mar 13

Mr Reasonable, if he wants to be accurate and reasonable, should state that this 'could' cost the council money not that 'it has' - confusing fact with speculation again. He will look rather silly if the money is recovered.

His own speculation above appears to be answered by a paragraph in a report he refers to in his wn blog:

"This was a situation that was of genuinely exceptional circumstances as a risk review was carried out on 2e2 in January 2013 using Experian reports. The report stated the company was satisfactory with high levels of borrowing and acquisition activity. There was no indication that this would lead to administration and hence could not have been predicted."

Mr Reasonable says...
7:51pm Mon 11 Mar 13

Dear Cllr Unreasonable, two points. 1. Barnet is an unsecured creditor. As such it is unlikely to get much if anything once the secured and preferential creditors are settled especially given the highly leveraged nature of the company. That is not 'speculation' but simply being realistic.
2. Rumblings about the financial health of the company have been apparent for some time. Suppliers have been unable to get credit insurance for at least a year and the company was issued with a number of CCJs last year.
Please note the Experian report was carried out in January 2013 long after the contract was signed and the advance payment made. Even if it had revealed anything it would have been too late anyway.
Whilst the CCJs and suppliers' inability to get credit insurance might not have stopped the council using 2e2 it should have at least made them question making such large advance payments.
This should be acting as a wake up call for Barnet. When you outsource vital services it brings with it a number of risks and even though officers (and consultants?) tell you everything will be alright, sometimes they are wrong and in some cases that can be catastrophic.

Grumblepop says...
12:17pm Wed 13 Mar 13

How about Councillor Thomas be penalised for bad judgement yet again, most would he was negligent. Councillor Thomas should reimburse the taxpayer for the losses he is responsible.for and sacked from his cabinet post.

Cadwallader says...
4:28am Sun 17 Mar 13

Have “catastrophic” repercussions been factored into the One Barnet plans?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree