News RSS Feed


New London Olympic logo torches debate

5:33am Tuesday 5th June 2007

comment Comments (25)   Have your say »


The £400,000 new logo of the London 2012 Olympics was unveiled at a star-studded ceremony - only to be greeted by public dissent.

Within 12 hours, an online petition to "get this terrible logo dropped as soon as possible" attracted more than 13,000 signatures.

Of more than 6,000 votes cast in an opinion poll on the BBC website by midnight, almost half gave the logo the lowest possible rating.

The jagged emblem, based on the year number 2012, comes in very bright shades of pink, blue, orange and green - an updated version of the Olympic colours. The Olympic rings and the word "London" are included in the first two digits.

The brand design firm Wolff Ollins, whose client list of more than 500 companies include Sony Ericsson and Unilever, was paid £400,000 for the job.

The team was briefed to make the new design less corporate and more youthful.

In particular, the logo was to be targeted at a young generation who had gradually lost interest in the Olympic movement over the last 20 years.

The emblem had to "inspire everyone to embrace the Olympic spirit - and make 2012 'Everyone's Games'," organisers said.

Apart from looking good on traditional memorabilia like T-shirts and mugs, it also had to work well in 3D-animations for mobile phones and on the web.

London 2012 chairman Lord Sebastian Coe unveiled the logo in front of celebrities like Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho and singer Jamelia.

"London 2012 will be Everyone's Games, everyone's 2012. This is the vision at the very heart of our brand," Lord Coe said.

"It will define the venues we build and the Games we hold and act as a reminder of our promise to use the Olympic spirit to inspire everyone and reach out to young people around the world.

"It is an invitation to take part and be involved."

The audience at The Roundhouse in Camden, north London, also included sports stars like gold medallist Kelly Holmes, top paralympic athelete Tanni Grey-Thompson, tennis ace Andy Murray, heptathlete Denis Lewis, decathlete Daley Thompson and long jumper Jonathan Edwards.

For the first time the same logo will be used for both the Olympic and Paralympic Games.

The new emblem will replace the 2012 bid logo that had the Thames weaving through its letters.

Olympic bosses described their logo as "dynamic, modern and flexible".

But in online forums, contributors have described it as looking like a swastika, a smashed window, a couple having sex and a symbol of the "ill conceived mess" that the Games has become.

Nevertheless a range of politicians, including Tony Blair, endorsed the logo.

The prime minister said: "We want London 2012 not just to be about elite sporting success.

"When people see the new brand, we want them to be inspired to make a positive change in their life."

Olympics Minister Tessa Jowell added: "This is not just a marketing logo, but a symbol that will become familiar, instantly recognisable and associated with our Games."

Opposition leader David Cameron, Liberal Democrats leader Sir Menzies Campbell and London mayor Ken Livingstone also backed the logo in statements.

Jacque Rogge, president of the International Olympic Committee President, welcomed the "truly innovative brand logo".

It "graphically captures the essence of the London 2012 Olympic Games - namely to inspire young people around the world through sport and the Olympic values," he said



Your Say YourTimes Series

JohnB, midlands says...
7:45am Tue 5 Jun 07

The spend of £400,000 on this logo just shows how profligate the money we are being asked to contribute is being spent. Companies milking the public to arrive a very poor design.

Ian Taylor, City says...
7:45am Tue 5 Jun 07

I think this logo is vibrant,new and exciting. Give it a chance. Also this site is biased asking for negative comments.

Garth, London says...
8:18am Tue 5 Jun 07

A GCSE Graphic student could have done better.

The Emperor's got no clothes indeed!

dawson milne, aberdeen says...
8:21am Tue 5 Jun 07

what the ....?

Jon, Coventry says...
8:32am Tue 5 Jun 07

Absolute disgrace to pay £400,000 for such childish rubbish.Whoever is responsible SHOULD be sacked, along with those who accepted it. But of course that won't happen will it? They will probably be awarded a prize by a group of like people, proficient in milking the public purse. Another example of a huge wastage of public money by an unelected incompetent Olympic QUANGO.I hope its shattered appearance does not represent a foretaste of Olympic failure to come.Compare this with China's great logo, and the rest of it's stunning on time, within budget preparations.
However,it is not too late to our stupid effort and come up with something more meaningful, perhaps by holding a prize competition among school children.

Aden Brill, Hereford says...
8:43am Tue 5 Jun 07

Look at it in a mirror and it resembles a nazi SS symbol.

Kim, Surrey says...
8:49am Tue 5 Jun 07

It looks like a cheap video game so will be greatly appreciated by those who have the attention span of a gnat. Is this the target audience?

doc Thody, brighton says...
9:00am Tue 5 Jun 07

Well ,it all went wrong for Lord Coe when he described the logo as "edgy" immediately removing what little design edge it would ever have. Design agencies work bloody hard to catch an essence, a feeling, that will stand the time test. This throwback work to toyah wilcox album cover art circa 1982 is totally unsophisticated, illegible and plain nasty in it's colour palette. The video work is the worst example of this and again, totally dated. Just watch Channel 4's TV links to know this. Future proof? Does the design agency responsible believe the world is going to regress 25 years in the next 5?

Laura, London says...
10:15am Tue 5 Jun 07

They'd have done better to have a school competition to design the logo - that really would have involved the young people.

Jill Birghall, says...
11:27am Tue 5 Jun 07

Eeeeeuuuuuuwwww!!

George, Oxford says...
11:41am Tue 5 Jun 07

"We don't do bland. This is not a bland city," says London 2012 chairman, Sebastian Coe.
Yes Seb! but you do do CRAP, and what does that say about London (sorry! london)as a city.
The people who did not like London hosting the 2012 Olympics would have moaned whatever the logo. However your 'inclusive' logo is spectacularly divisive and most people hate it. Unfortunatly by association it may turn more people to be negative against the games. WELL DONE SEB!!!!

Andrea, london says...
12:14pm Tue 5 Jun 07

my 12 year old sister can design better than this??? whats the point of paying £400,000 for this? How is this logo'flexible' when it has got sharp and jaggered ends?

it is by far the ugliest design i have seen. no offence.

Matt Cooke, Essex says...
1:01pm Tue 5 Jun 07

This just goes to show how design by committee can go oh so badly wrong. No strong brand leader with a strong idea from the start.
Wolff Olins is a top design consultancy with more plaudits than complaints to its name. Anyone remember Orange??
As for the price, 2 years with a full team of designers and account managers with all the associated meetings and attendant billed time is about right.
Commentators and journalists should do the background research first before being so negative.
Whilst its not a great design, its far from bad and is better than Beijings Panda bear for gods sake!

Adam Smith, London says...
1:26pm Tue 5 Jun 07

Interesting to note that you can make out the word 'Zion' in the logo, should please some and upset others!!

SK, London says...
1:50pm Tue 5 Jun 07

I think its ok.. People will moan what ever the logo would have been. You can never please everyone. As for 400K, thats the rate for major design companies, its a expensive world out there kids.

peter, london says...
3:34pm Tue 5 Jun 07

Ha ha,its the worst logo i think I`ve ever seen. And it cost £400,000. Still, when its not their own money, who cares how much it costs !

suzy, clacton-on-sea says...
5:18pm Tue 5 Jun 07

my 4 year-old niece could have come up with something better & all it would have cost is a donation to the R.S.P.C.A.

MAC, Canada says...
5:42pm Tue 5 Jun 07

It's the most beautiful subliminal swastika I've ever seen. Heil!

Malc, Hampshire says...
6:25pm Tue 5 Jun 07

Hmmm where does one begin ??? The logo is aweful the management (alias committee) are useless to say the least. Over budget already and trying to shrug their incompetense is about par for the course.

Its not to late to pull out of the whole operation and hand the games to someone who will enjoy making a catastrophic loss - no doubt we the tax payers will suffer from here on in.

Everyone should refuse to pay the Olympic levy and give the money from the lottery back to good causes.

Bill, Salem, USA says...
7:40pm Tue 5 Jun 07

What it looks like is a politically-correct attempt to reproduce a 1970's American radio station emblem...you know, something neato, groovy, or chic, something perhaps designed by a schizophrenic circus clown with pastel chalk, a five minute time limit and a ten-pence budget. Other than that,it is very well done.

Olympic, USA says...
10:31pm Tue 5 Jun 07

Well, it's done one thing and that's making people talk about it! Thats the job of a Logo. Is it not!

The Olympics is a good thing and will bring in money into the city.

Plus, 2012 is some time away. So make your own and submit and maybe they will give you the money!

Si Bye, Yorkshire says...
11:06pm Tue 5 Jun 07

What an utter bag of W***. I cant believe that a page form a 2 year olds coulouring book is now a logo representing our country. And how the hell is that appealing to young people anyway. i wish i got paid £400'000 to be an idiot. If the whole nation hates it why dont the scrap it.

Andrew, Northampton says...
4:14pm Thu 7 Jun 07

It's a disgrace, what's wrong with the old logo incorporating the Thames? This new logo looks like the work of a child!!! Scrap it and bring back the old one before its too late!!

Aris, Greece says...
9:05pm Thu 7 Jun 07

That is a very ugly logo indeed, That will not be at my heart, memories and events maby, but not this cheap 'expensive' logo.

Nigel King, Suffolk says...
10:42pm Fri 8 Jun 07

The spend of £400,000 on this logo just shows that rip off Britain is alive and well

Comments are closed on this article.

The new Olympic logo was unveiled on Monday. The new jagged 2012 logo will replace the old emblem with the looping Thames

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »