Report this comment
  • "Gumblepop i am not interested in party politics. I am interested in transparency. As a resident i would have thought the new owners and as i learned today, they are not the new owners yet, should consult widely with local residents on what they intend to do with the site in 1 year, 5 years and 10 years. If they care about local residents the prospective owners should want to have public meetings and share their plans. Not hide away and wait to be cajoled into quotes by the local press. This is common sense irrespective of a legal obligation to do so. They have chose not to. There has been no consultation with local residents. Pursuing the purchase of this area without proper consultation shows, in my umble opinion, that they don't care about local residents. They are just interested in pursuing their own agenda regardless. This is the only conclusion I can reach as the vast majority of local residents did not know about this until the newspaper investigated and made a headline. Lets focus on one thing: what will happen to the proposals for the site in 1 yr, 5 yrs and 10 years. Why haven't they sort to involve local people in the discussion? What havent they sort local opinion? WHY HAVENT THEY SHARED THEIR PLANS WITH LOCAL PEOPLE. They have not bothered it seems to me. Tell me Mr Gumblepop do you think it is right and proper for a new owner of community land to not share with local residents before their purchase in 10 days time their plans? I am fascinated with your answer. Its the only question i have for you.

    Surely it must be negligent on their part to not share their plans with local residents properly??????????

    PS Before you say they did - i fundamentally object - as i nore my neighbours nor their neighbours nor anyone on my road knew anything about it and we live very close!!!!"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Fears Kentish Town FC could be planning stadiumon Chase Lodge in Mill Hill

Councillor John Hart at the ground in Page Street Councillor John Hart at the ground in Page Street

A NEW football stadium could be developed on land recently bought by a Camden community group in the heart of Mill Hill.

Plans have emerged revealing Kentish Town Football Club want to develop a stand on the Chase Lodge Playing Fields as a new permanent home for the club.

The semi-professional Spartan South Midlands Premier Division outfit currently play at nearby Copthall Stadium due to a lack of pitches in Camden itself.

In December the 16-acre site in Page Street was sold to the Camden Community Football and Sports Association (CCSFA) bought the site from the council for £700,000.

Councillor John Hart, a Conservative representative of the area, said he would strongly oppose any development plans at the site.

He said: “This is green belt land and any attempts to put a football ground here would inevitably lead to it being eaten up by tarmac and concrete. A stand would be disastrous on this site.

“There were a lot of questions being asked about how a community group could get their hands on £700,000 in the current climate, but if there is a commercial interest behind it that would explain it.

“Residents are already unhappy with the amount of parking in Page Street on weekends for people going to play sport, so this would make things worse still.”

Related links

After the sale of the ground in December a statement appeared on the club website saying they had “secured a home which they can call their own”.

Chairman Catherine Dye told the club's website: “There will be many more long and hard days ahead but when we finally lay that first brick on Chase Lodge, then the dream will be finally realised.”

Mike Connolly, who owns a cottage in the grounds, said he will fight “tooth and nail” against any new stadium.

He added: “What we do not want is hundreds of chanting football fans on Saturday and Sundays.

“They are already planning a large intensification of use with up to 600 children coming to play there at weekends, so this would make things even worse for residents.”

John Turtle, the chairman of the Mill Hill Preservation Society said they would also oppose developments there.

He added: “This is a green belt site and we would oppose any attempts to expand the built environment there, it should be kept open and putting a stadium or stand there is not keeping it open.

“If they build a stadium it will have to pay its way and that means corporate hospitality and things like that.”

Diane Culigan, the chairman of the CCSFA, would not be drawn on any future plans for the site.

She told the Times Series: “We plan to improve the site and make it much better than it is now.

“What we need to concentrate on in the short term is things like replace the nets and maintain the fences as well as clearing up the litter and making sure the grass is cut.

“Lots of straightforward things that will not be detrimental to the people around.”

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree