News RSS Feed


Mill Hill residents agree to form pressure group over Saracens plans for Barnet Copthall stadium

Hilary Cass addresses the meeting last night Hilary Cass addresses the meeting last night

RESIDENTS living close to the Barnet Copthall stadium agreed last night to form a group to help shape the future of the site.

Premiership rugby club Saracens want to create a 10,000 seater arena on what chief executive Edward Griffiths described as a “run down” venue in Mill Hill.

The plans would see the stadium fitted with retractable seating, allowing the Barnet Shaftesbury Harriers athletics club to use the running track in the summer months.

However, neighbours fear the plans will create traffic chaos and cause problems with light and noise pollution, and loss of facilities for local people.

Around 80 people attended last night's meeting at the stadium arranged by residents to express their views on the plans, which have not yet been put to Barnet Council for consideration.

One Page Street resident relayed her experiences of living near Leicester Tiger's ground of Welford Road, where she said on some match days she “could not get out of my driveway” because of traffic.

However, a Saracens fans at the meeting pointed out the ground has a capacity of 24,000, more than double what is proposed by Saracens.

Another lady said the plans could be a “trojan horse” and lead to more development in the ground in later years.

Concerns were also raised about the impact on local activities on the 16 match days the ground could be in use each season, with parking for youth activities a major concern.

Saracens had planned to use local schools, but one resident warned nearby Copthall School is already heavily used throughout the weekend.

Hilary Cass, who fought against Barnet FC's plans for the ground a decade ago and chaired the meeting, told the group: “We don't want to be seen as NIMBYs opposing development which would have significant benefit to the youngsters of the area.

“But having listened to what everyone has said there is a significant risk of impeding quite a lot of activity already going on in the area.”

Ex-Hendon MP Andrew Dismore warned residents they were living in “cloud cuckoo land” if they thought a controlled parking zone would be needed and asked “who's going to pay for it?”.

A poll of the group revealed around half had not been notified of a consultation meeting on January 6 over the plans.

One resident, who is a Saracens season ticket holder, said the group was in a “favourable position to negotiate” with the club for the terms they wanted.

Mr Griffiths, who was asked to wait downstairs while the group discussed the plans, was invited to answer questions on it.

He told the meeting the club wants to run as a “partnership” with the local community and planned to allow local schools used the revamped stadium “for free”.

In terms of community benefits he pledged to have Saracens Foundation coaches go into local schools and said it would be a “force for good” and “bring a new vitality to the community”.

He added: “It's a disaster for us if all of the prophecies of doom come true. From day one we have invested thousands in the traffic management plan and will continue to invest in the future.”

Mr Griffiths also said the club would withdraw its interest if it was clear the majority of local residents were against the plans.

At the end of the meeting the majority of residents voted to form a group to contest the application in its current form and find a sustainable way for the stadium to be regenerated.

Comments(7)

Dr Julia Hines says...
5:56pm Wed 16 Feb 11

As the Chair of Age UK Barnet I have met with Saracens Foundation. We very much hope to work together to provide more exercise classes for older people within the borough. I am really pleased that they do not see their community work stopping with schools and children, important though that is.

Yes, I can understand parking could be an issue, but 16 days a year is not an enormous amount of inconvenience. I live near the Sternberg Centre, so it is difficult to park in my road on Jewish holidays. It is a bit irritating, but I cannot say that it is detrimental to my quality of life. It is very different to not being able to park in your own road ever. It would surely be possible to have a CPZ which only operates on match days, as they do around the Arsenal Stadium.

Bringing investment into the area, and visitors who will help to support local shops, cafes and pubs to thrive must be a good thing.

DannyMan says...
8:51am Thu 17 Feb 11

"We don't want to be seen as NIMBYs opposing development which would have significant benefit to the youngsters of the area." No? Too late then ducky, that's EXACTLY what you sound like.

DannyMan says...
9:48am Thu 17 Feb 11

Obviously a match-day parking scheme is required. On match-days. 16 days a year. And Andrew Dismal wants to know "who's going to pay for it?" Um, well, Andrew, the answer is staring you in the face: Saracens will pay for it. Obviously. Is that really the best you can do? I realise that it must hurt to lose your comfortable seat in Parliament but your gonna have to come up with something better than this transparently political crusade to get back into favour. I understand that someone suggested at the meeting that the NIMBYs should distance themselves from you because of the nakedly political nature of your stance, and I reckon that's good advice!

Jon10 says...
9:22pm Thu 17 Feb 11

Just for information, which would not affect the Saracens proposal, or what you think of it: the abandoned railway at Copthall features in a Brent Council rail proposal in the 'Willesden and Brent Times' this week.

Anthony7 says...
7:12pm Sun 20 Feb 11

What do Copthall Stadium runners think about only having 4 of the current 8 tracks available for the 6 months of the year that the 'temporary' rugby stands will be placed over them? No sprinting etc then during Autumn-Spring as the stands go up at the beginning of the season and come down 6 months later.

The stands will also go over the high jump.

PJE123 says...
4:53pm Mon 21 Feb 11

Anthony7:

Having seen the plans at one of the Consultation Evenings, I know that the proposal includes provision for an indoor athletics track underneath the main stand.

This would allow for year-round sprint training. As an athlete myself, the majority of our winter training takes place indoors, with many people having to travel as far away as Slough to use an indoor track.

The jump pits and high jump will be based away from the main arena, throughout the winter.

Everyone at Shaftesbury Barnet Harriers and UK Athletics seem delighted that Saracens are willing to invest in a facility which is in much need of some renovation.

Anthony7 says...
4:48pm Tue 22 Feb 11

But the size of the indoor track under the stand is very small and the sprinters are unhappy with Sarasons. They do run outside in winter.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree