News RSS Feed


Saracens' plans for Mill Hill's Copthall stadium criticised in Mayor's report

SARACENS' plans to move to Barnet Copthall Stadium do not fit with London's development plans, according to the Mayor of London's office.

In a stage one ruling on the proposals to develop the 1960s athletics stadium into a 10,000 seater venue the planning officers say there is too much car parking and it threatens the Green Belt.

A group of local residents are upset by the plans and say there is not enough parking and it will bring transport problems to the area.

However, the Premiership club says the proposal would see £14m invested in facilities and open them up to the community and schools for free most days of the year.

They have also chosen satellite parking sites and vowed to put marshals in on 16 match days each year to stop parking on local roads.

However, in the first ruling the Mayor's office says: “There is an over provision of onsite and satellite parking spaces as well as insufficient details about how car parking in the vicinity of the site will be managed and controlled.”

It also criticises the proposals, which include rebuilding two permanent stands at the site, as “inappropriate development in the Green Belt”.

Today's report means Saracens could find it impossible to get the current scheme passed even if approved by Barnet Council's planning committee, as they have to be signed off by the Mayor.

However, the 27-page document, an initial assessment of the plans, does support the “principle” of refurbishing the stadium, and says the extra crowds drawn in on match days and conferences may be allowed in “very special circumstances”.

These may include a lack of suitable alternative options for the site and the community benefits offered by it, as well as protecting the rights of existing users.

Comments(3)

mrsangry999 says...
10:28pm Thu 5 May 11

ah, so: to sum up the position of London Tories:

Brent X Cricklewood, Labour area + loads of extra traffic etc = good

SaracensCopthall, Tory area, GLA election=bad

ross86 says...
10:39am Fri 6 May 11

Anyone who knows anything about planning will tell you this is actually excellent news for Saracens. As far as stage one rulings go, this is extremely positive because it outlines exactly what is required for the proposals to comply with the Mayor’s London Plan. The process continues, with or without the support of publicity-seeking councilors and their lackey journalists.

Mr_Growser says...
11:05am Sat 7 May 11

Larry the Lamb tells me ross86 of Hendon is wrong. Having read the letter in full, he says the requirements are so ooooonerous he thinks Saaaracens will struuuuggle to meet them - beeh - all 26 paaaages. Some rude animals from Mr Noah's Ark have been rooting around at Companies House and have been gossiping at Mrs Goose's Tea Shop about the huge losses Saracens made over the last three years. As for Dennis the Dachshund, he says "After some long time of pondering ze Mill Hill Preservation Society has strong objections to Barnet Council sent." Now at last they agree with me - it ought not to be allowed!

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree