Top Stories RSS Feed


Barnet Cabinet members forced to adjourn meeting because of public outbursts

TOP councillors were forced to abandon a crucial meeting in mid-flow last night amid public anger at their plans for this year's budget.

Barnet Council's cabinet left the meeting after just 45 minutes because of a barrage of heckling from around 150 irate residents who had gathered to see the latest budget plans being pushed through.

Police and security were called in to try to stop people shouting out as members of the public asked an unprecedented number of questions of councillors about their plans to slash £54m over the next three years.

Key decisions taken included approval to leave 13 of 21 children's centres open, change sheltered housing provision for the elderly and agreeing to increase a raft of parking charges.

During the meeting councillors moved to quieten the crowd with leader Councillor Lynne Hillan telling the group: “There are places where we can have proper discussions and cabinet is not one of them.”

This drew howls of anger from people who urged councillors to suspend the rules to take all 20 questions put forward, instead of cutting them off after 30 minutes.

After continued public interruptions transport councillor Brian Coleman said: “I've rarely met such rude members of the public.”

Several questions came from residents in controlled parking zones (CPZs) who fear an increase on visitor and residents permits is being levied unfairly on them to repair all roads in the borough.

East Finchley lawyer David Attwood, who has threatened a judicial review if the prices are increased, asked why the cabinet had rejected other cash-raising ideas, including using cameras to enforce parking and road rules.

Cllr Coleman told him: “It's mine and this administration's view CCTV was not installed to penalise motorists.”

Cllr Coleman was also asked by Jeanne Wray whether there would be a reduction for the elderly using the visitor permits, which will go from £1 to £4 each, even for a short stay.

He told her it would be better for people staying a short time to use pay and display parking, even though many residential roads do not have the facilities.

Comments(5)

NewsFromNowhere says...
10:12am Tue 15 Feb 11

Who do these people think they are?

A public meeting isn't "the proper place" to discuss massive cuts to the services we all rely on?

People feeling outraged and powerless are the rudest you've ever met?

You are paid over £100k - as far as I can see - for little more than cutting the services on which those who can never dream of your remuneration depend. And hurting and offending people in the process.

There's only so much people will take from these out of touch self-serving excuses for politicians

Dr Julia Hines says...
10:34am Tue 15 Feb 11

One of the most stunning facts to come out of the meeting that, although the council plans to make £157,000 savings by removing 11 lollipop crossing attendants, the salary savings for the lollipop attendants is £41,000. Apparently Barnet council needs to spend £116,000 on management, HR and IT in relation to this service. When asked how the full savings of £157,000 could be achieved the council seemed unable to reply.

Perhaps if these costs were reduced overall, frontline services could be preserved.

Flamingos says...
2:09pm Tue 15 Feb 11

Cllr Coleman has a cheek to call residents rude. We were trying to exercise our democratic rights. The response of Coleman was to sit giggling and guffawing at us. I suppose he calls that good manners, the buffoon. That's what he thinks of residents exercising their democratic rights - we are to be scoffed at. The rest of the pack of braindead bureaucrats were hell-bent on refusing to allow us to exercise our democratic right to be heard on issues which crucially affect our futures. We had no option but to shout to be heard.

mrsangry999 says...
5:41pm Tue 15 Feb 11

This meeting told you all you need to know about the state of the borough: the shambolic, contemptuous, arrogant and self serving Tory councillors who hardly share a brain cell between them and who hold collective responsibilty for holding us all to ransom with a budget over which we have no control.

mallowe says...
7:53pm Tue 15 Feb 11

Perhaps as a "Rude" member of the public, the CONsarvative gin swilling Council can tell me who the leader of the Council was when the decision to invest £27.4 million in the Icelandic banks was and what Michael freer was doing for a living when this decision was made??? My understanding on perusal and investigayion of this matter was that the alarm bells were ringing at about this time!

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree