Top Stories RSS Feed


Barnet council asks for report on costs of filming council meetings

PLANS to broadcast Barnet Council meetings online will go before all the members of the council after a committee commissioned a report into the project's feasibility.

In recent weeks several bloggers have videoed parts of various meetings at Hendon Town Hall despite a continuing ban on it in the council’s constitution.

The move comes after communities minister Eric Pickles wrote to local authorities asking them to allow blogging and tweeting from meetings.

However, council leader Lynne Hillan told the Times Series only “respectable” media would be allowed to film if a request was made, but later said the council would have a vote on filming of meetings.

On Thursday a meeting of the general functions committee unanimously agreed to pass the decision on to the full council so that all members could vote.

Councillor Robert Rams, a cabinet member who sits on the committee, said: “Everyone agreed it shouldn’t be agreed by just our committee but for all councillors to vote on.

“We now have to look at the cost of putting in the equipment and webcasting meetings, but that will all come in the report.

“I’m very much for webcasting meetings, I think it opens up the council and makes it more transparent.”

He could not say whether there would be a free vote for Conservative members on the plans.

Labour Councillor Claire Farrier, who also sits on the committee, said her group had unanimously voted for webcasting when similar proposals came out in September 2009.

She added: “I will definitely be voting in favour of it again, it is good for transparency and members of the community want it.”

The report is likely to come before a full council meeting in July.

Comments(5)

danhope says...
3:37pm Tue 5 Apr 11

As someone (the only person) present at the meeting, who addressed the Committee, Robert Rams clearly called for a free vote at the Council meeting on this.

Dan Thomas sitting next to him, and I may have caught him nodding as Robert Rams spoke.

Aside from Robert Rams no other Councillor spoke up for the government's firm advice to allow residents to record audio and video from the gallery. Whilst the government views this as 'fundamental to democracy' it seems the Councillors don't.

One fallacious argument that was put forward was that should the Council spend, what I will think will be over £100k, for Parliamentary style broadcasting for the reason that it would eliminate coverage being re-edited. As anyone who watches the TV news will know every broadcast contains edited highlights of soundbites from Parliament, often out of context.

As I said to the Committee the Council should allow my (currently banned) pledge on pledgebank to organise free video coverage and embrace the Big Society. It would cost the Council nothing. The Council doesn't have the money to set up a TV broadcasting channel, and even if they did spending such large sums just to attempt to avoid damage to fragile egos can't really be appropriate.

MrMustard says...
5:14pm Tue 5 Apr 11

Whether or not the Council have their own over-priced system or not it does not stop the public from having the right to film. This is just going to be another £100,000 of profligate spending.

mrsangry999 says...
5:20pm Tue 5 Apr 11

it is rather surprising to see that the Times is silent on the subject of the bloggers' call for a public inquiry into the use of private, unidentified security employees to 'control' and to secretly film ordinary residents attending a council meeting. Surely this is a matter of public interest, and should be covered: the irony of residents being treated like this while elected councillors who are supposed to be accountable to us object to being filmed is staggering.

danhope says...
5:25pm Tue 5 Apr 11

Mrs Angry, why are you surprised at the stance of the Times and Press? They are what Hillan calls the 'respectable media' (ssshh don't mention all the Council paid for ads!)

The Council thinks it should elevate the position of journalists from these two esteemed journals and block the rest - new media, bloggers, competitor newspapers - from getting the same privileges.

I guess my comment will get deleted, but why would the Times want to promote competition - especially from it's former bloggers like RogT?

mrsangry999 says...
2:31pm Wed 6 Apr 11

this morning there were four comments on the story about Barnet destroying the no it doesn't exist, yes it does, footage of me and other residents - where have they gone?

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree