'No great demand for gay marriage'

Times Series: Philip Hammond said the introduction of civil partnerships had dealt with the 'very real disadvantage' gay couples faced in the past Philip Hammond said the introduction of civil partnerships had dealt with the 'very real disadvantage' gay couples faced in the past

Prime Minister David Cameron's plans for same-sex marriage have unnecessarily upset "vast numbers of people", Defence Secretary Philip Hammond has said.

Mr Hammond said there was a "real sense of anger" among voters over the Government's legislation to allow gay weddings.

He said there was no great demand in the country for change and criticised the amount of parliamentary time which had been devoted to the issue, telling BBC1's Question Time: "I have just never felt that this is what we should be focusing on."

"This change does redefine marriage. For millions and millions of people who are married, the meaning of marriage changes. There is a real sense of anger among many people who are married that any government thinks it has the ability to change the definition of an institution like marriage," he said.

He said the introduction of civil partnerships in 2005 had dealt with the "very real disadvantage" that gay couples faced in the past. "There was no huge demand for this and we didn't need to spend a lot of parliamentary time and upset vast numbers of people in order to do this," he said.

Mr Hammond's comments echo the concerns of many traditionalist Tory MPs who say the issue is driving supporters away from the party, but they are likely to irritate Mr Cameron, who has made the change a key symbol of his efforts to modernise the Conservatives.

Equality Minister Maria Miller on Thursday night put forward plans for a review on extending civil partnerships to heterosexual couples, in a bid to quell opposition to the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill in the House of Commons. But under the amendment tabled by Mrs Miller, the review would not take place until five years after gay marriage has been introduced, to allow time for the impact of the new arrangements to be assessed. The review could pave the way for civil partnerships to be extended, or, if demand has plummeted, scrapped altogether.

The proposal was dismissed by Conservative former children's minister Tim Loughton as "a spoiling measure from the Government". Mr Loughton, who has tabled his own amendment for the immediate introduction of straight civil partnerships, told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: "They should have done this with the Bill." In a Government consultation on gay marriage, 61% of people said they would like to see civil partnerships extended to heterosexuals, he said. "They've had the consultation, there's a clear mandate for it, there's a clear majority - as will be shown in an opinion poll this weekend - amongst MPs. Let's get on with it, rather than let it drag on and on."

Mrs Miller has warned that the addition of straight civil partnerships to the current Marriage Bill would significantly delay the introduction of gay marriage and add to the cost of the changes. But Mr Loughton, an opponent of gay marriage, insisted his amendment was "absolutely not" designed to wreck the Bill.

The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill returns to MPs on Monday and its passage through parliament is expected to remain bumpy. It is unlikely that couples will be able to take advantage of any law change until well into next year, with the review of civil partnerships then likely in 2019.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree