Disgusted of Tunbridge is alive and well – in Barnet (From Times Series)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting TIMES NEWS to 80360, or email us
Disgusted of Tunbridge is alive and well – in Barnet
12:27pm Monday 18th August 2008 in Mike Freer By Mike Freer
I find my post bag contradictory. One day people decry the lack of availability of homes for their children and grandchildren to rent or buy. Most people still want to buy, but even the credit crunched prices make them a real stretch for first-time buyers (and the housing market needs entrants to push the chain along). Then the next day, perhaps from the vantage point of a well stuffed armchair or perhaps cosseted by family money, I am assailed as a philistine for the temerity of allowing new homes to be built. Oh and sometimes the two are combined – go figure.
Oddly the ‘no more houses brigade’ often live in houses that were built on fields and sometimes as recently as just twenty years ago. Strangely enough I don’t want to see huge swathes of the Borough concreted over, but unlike the armchair strategists, I have a responsibility to ensure those living in council housing (now managed by Barnet Homes) have homes that meet the decent homes standard laid down by law. Even if it were not a legal requirement, a trip to some of our estates highlights that many of the buildings have reached the end of their useful life.
On top of this, Government grants to refurbish or rebuild the housing stock beyond its useful life are woefully inadequate to meet Barnet’s needs. Though if our council tenants were not handing over £9.4million to subsidise the Treasury and council tenants outside London – many more repairs could be paid for locally. In the absence of sensible Treasury policy, we have to find alternative ways of rebuilding our crumbling estates. So like many Boroughs we turn to the private sector, underutilised land on our estates is then used to build private homes for sale. The private developer in return demolishes and rebuilds new homes for our tenants. Perhaps not an ideal solution, but a pragmatic real-world solution. No-one else has yet come up with another method we can afford to demolish and rebuild these homes.
On top of that, of course, we have Government targets to provide new homes, these targets are backed up with the London Plan (which even Mayor Johnson has yet to rewrite), requiring us to expand the housing stock. In Barnet this means more homes/flats for shared equity to get people on the housing ladder and, of course, more flats and houses for outright purchase. The vast majority of people still aspire to own their own homes and we are meeting that aspiration.
Wrapped around this is the Three Strand Policy on planning, to identify which parts of the Borough that can deliver higher density growth, which parts will have lower density development and which parts will have no development.
A former Prime Minister once said ‘you can’t buck the market’ – well the market wants to live in Barnet, wants to buy homes in Barnet and the market wants to meet that need. So either we are pragmatic and harness the market or we try and be ‘Canute’ like and get drowned by it.
Comments(4)
David Miller
says...
10:51pm Wed 20 Aug 08
Councillors are elected to serve, not to rule. Your responsibility is to the Barnet residents who already live here - many for more than 40 years - not to those who aspire to live here.
Who exactly are the “no more houses” brigade? Do they actually exist or is this yet another of your economical actualités? A sustainable number of family houses with gardens would be welcomed by most. The opposition is to your proposals to allow the construction of thousands of soulless matchbox flats.
Where is your mandate for this high density urbanisation of the borough?
Let us not forget that the justification for your coup in 2006 was because Brian Salinger’s housing plans were supposedly so left wing that he would have built the Tories out of the borough, and you were the man to stop him. But now in power you say you have to build however many homes Gordon Brown tells you to build. So what exactly was the point of ditching the leader who had just won an election with an increased majority?
I fundamentally disagree with Brian Salinger’s ideas on housing but I accept that his motivation was borne of a genuine belief that it was in the best interests of Barnet. You only seem to do what is in the best interests of Mike Freer.
danhope
says...
6:25pm Mon 15 Sep 08
East_Finchley_Helen
says...
10:13pm Tue 23 Sep 08
danhope
says...
2:02pm Sun 17 Jan 10
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with