News RSS Feed


Bees seated or face boot from the league

8:04am Thursday 4th October 2007

comment Comments (5)   Have your say »


BARNET Football Club's future has been thrown into jeopardy after plans for a £7million redevelopment of its Underhill stadium were recommended for refusal by planning officers.

Under Football League rules, Underhill must have at least 2,000 covered seats by the end of the 2007/8 season next May, and the club has been told by the league that it risks expulsion if it fails to meet that target.

The ground currently has a capacity of around 5,300, but only 1,000 seats are covered.

The plans, being put to a Barnet Council planning committee on Wednesday, include the building of new stands behind both goals, new floodlights and a changing room block.

But the planning officer's report says the building of the north stand would result in a loss of rear garden space for homes in adjoining Westcombe Drive, as well as being 'overbearing', 'visually obtrusive' and causing excessive levels of noise and disturbance.

The report also says that the proposed pavilion would be an inappropriate development on Green Belt land.

Council leader Mike Freer said: "The plans could be deemed to go against the Unitary Development Plan, which is a legal document. That would mean residents could take us to court. Then, if we grant planning permission over those gardens, those properties would suffer from planning blight and the council could be liable for compensation.

"I've had long conversations with the club and we want to help, but that doesn't mean we can break the law. In the short term, the club can achieve 5,000 seats on three sides, and leave the north side alone until they own all the properties in Westcombe Drive. I'm sure we will sort this out for the benefit of the club and the borough."

But Barnet FC chairman Tony Kleanthous argued that planning blight in Westcombe Drive would be avoided because the club was prepared to pay the market value to buy them. He said the club had already bought two of the properties and was in talks with other residents.

Mr Kleanthous said: "It's very difficult for us. You can't attract players when they know your club is going to be expelled from the Football League. People wonder if they're going to have a job at the end of the season.

"That's the effect when you've got a council that won't support you in anything you do. We've always said this site is too small to meet league standards, but we've followed what councillors told us to do, and now they're recommending it for refusal. We aren't asking for the Emirates here. We just want a roof over our heads."

A decision is due to be made on Monday.


Your Say YourTimes Series

Gary, Finchley says...
8:58am Thu 4 Oct 07

So much for the council and the club getting on better. Goes to show Mike Freer and Tony Kleanthous really probably can't stand each other at all. Another false dawn for the club, the only way to survive is to get out of Barnet. A real shame.

Mike and Alex, Barnet says...
9:27am Thu 4 Oct 07

I regularly go to Barnet with my son and we will be really sad if the council does not support Barnet FC.

Sam, Finchley says...
10:50am Thu 4 Oct 07

Is this another false dawn for Barnet FC? It's time for the council to openly state their support for the club and actively work towards achieving prolonged success for the club through a financially viable stadium. The club are a shining beacon of success against all odds, and one that the council should be doing their all to support.

lou hardy, barnet says...
8:13pm Thu 4 Oct 07

most other councils seem to bend overbackwards to help football clubs in their areas. Barnet fc is an asset to the community and has been around for 100 years - far longer than any of the residents that live round there. IF Barnet fc has to move out of the borough - will the land round there stay as green belt??? I wonder how long it will take for the ground to be flattened and houses built on it as well as houses/flats being built on the so called green belt land behind the ground!!

Rog T, Mill Hill says...
5:15pm Sat 6 Oct 07

Why are the Tories so anti Barnet FC. I suspect that the problem is that Freer & Coleman just don't like football and its supporters. They are too short sighted to see what an assett it could be. Just as they missed out on promoting Barnet Copthall as a possible Olympic venue. I suspect that they think the only hobby the residents of Barnet have is tittle-tattling in swanky restaurants, as these never seem to have problems getting planning consent for these.

Comments are closed on this article.

Left standing: Barnet FC wants covered seats in its north terrace to comply with Football League rules (K15182-19) Left standing: Barnet FC wants covered seats in its north terrace to comply with Football League rules (K15182-19)

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »