Allocation of Gypsy and Traveller sites for the borough cut (From Times Series)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting TIMES NEWS to 80360, or email us
Allocation of Gypsy and Traveller sites for the Barnet borough cut by the Mayor of London Boris Johnson
3:15pm Wednesday 24th March 2010 in News By Kevin Bradford
Mayor of London Boris Johnson cuts Gypsy and Traveller site target for Barnet borough
THE target for the number of Gypsy and Traveller sites the borough will be expected to provide has been cut by the Mayor of London.
Under new proposals, Barnet Council will only have to provide 16 sites by 2017 compared to the initial target of 22 put forward by Boris Johnson last year.
The move by the Mayor will cut the number of proposed sites across London from 538 to 238 after he admitted the original plans “could not be justified, nor achieved”.
The number of sites in the borough would still be the joint third highest in the city, with neighbouring boroughs of Harrow, Brent, Haringey and Enfield only sharing an allocation of 22 between them.
Staff working for the mayor said consultations on the draft London Plan “highlighted concerns about the methodology used to set the targets and raised serious doubts that they could be achieved”.
Previously, Barnet Council bosses claimed 22 sites would not be suitable for the borough.
The alterations have been branded “more realistic” and “fair” for all 33 boroughs, although Mr Johnson remains adamant he wants to improve the capital's poor record in delivering pitches fro the Gypsy and Traveller community.
He said: “In light of the feedback we received it was apparent that the targets we had proposed could not be justified, nor achieved.
“I want to make real progress in improving on the capital’s poor record in increasing the provision of sites for the Gypsy and Traveller communities, but there is no point setting targets that will clearly not be delivered.
“This is a complicated issue, with many factors to be taken into account, and I am confident that what I have put forward now strikes the right balance between deliverability and addressing need, and sets an ambitious agenda for all involved.”
The new proposals will now be subject to a further seven week public consultation before potentially becoming part of the full replacement plan preparation.
Councillor Merrick Cockell, Chairman of London Councils, said the announcement was “welcome” and shows Mr Johnson “is listening to the boroughs”.
He added: “These more realistic targets show the Mayor is responding to the boroughs’ legitimate concerns on this very sensitive issue.”
Comments(11)
justitia
says...
6:51pm Wed 24 Mar 10
danhope
says...
11:43pm Wed 24 Mar 10
Rog T
says...
12:21am Thu 25 Mar 10
justitia
says...
10:18am Thu 25 Mar 10
mrsangry999
says...
3:21pm Thu 25 Mar 10
Rog T
says...
12:22pm Fri 26 Mar 10
To clarify my comment. There are rumours that the new sites will be located on Green belt fields in Mill Hill and Totteridge. I personally believe that the green belt should be defended against ALL developments. Whether this is new traveller sites or rich Tory supporting landowners using temporary buildings to get around the rules, my view is the same. Barnet legally have to have these sites, the issue is whether the CONSERVATIVES use this as an excuse to further erode the green belt.
justitia
says...
2:06pm Sun 28 Mar 10
mrsangry999
says...
6:21pm Sun 28 Mar 10
http://wwwbrokenbarn
et.blogspot.com/
Grumblepop
says...
5:56pm Mon 29 Mar 10
Sadly, your neighbours are tenants of a house (not a Gypsy Caravan) owned by a private landlord.The Council administers Housing Benefit on behalf of the Benefits Agency (A huge error by a Conservative Government whom also heavily subsidised the Right to Buy ). Thus far, under both Homeless and Housing legislation Barnet Council have fulfilled their obligations, regardless of any political party elected to govern.
It will not be any comfort to you so please, accept my apologies, I wish not to be patronising because, you will have already sought legal advice from Housing and Property specialists on a prohibitive injunction for 'nuisance' to be served on the landlord and property owner. Notwithstanding the Environmental Health's obligations, Barnet Council nor the Police will do much. The latter have much more pressing cases to deal with than 'neighbour nuisance.'
Try Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors in Camden or both Powell Spencer and Daniel & Harris of Kilburn,
Do also write to Conservative Councillor Melvyn Cohen, Solicitor with a property law dept in his partnership. He also has the Planning Portfolio.
mrsangry999
says...
6:48pm Mon 29 Mar 10
justitia
says...
5:25pm Wed 2 Jun 10
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with